RSS

The Economics of the Allied Victory

05 Feb

Not Why the Axis Lost – Why the Allies Won
This is an interesting final chapter for Overy – one that takes the same title as the book. As Overy tells the reader early on in the chapter, Hitler’s Germany did not lose the war because of the “two-front” hypothesis or that he was up against a “greater GDP” than he and Germany possessed. Overy adds that: “Materially rich, but divided, demoralized, and poorly led, the Allied coalition would have lost the war, however exaggerated Axis ambitions, however flawed their moral outlook.”[1] So Overy’s statements beg the question – was it not so much that Germany (and possibly Japan) lost the war as much as it was that the Allied “Grand Alliance” won the war? Perhaps it was so. To Overy’s point that had the Allies been divided, demoralized, and poorly led the Allies might have lost; Gerhard L. Weinberg notes in A World at Arms: A Global History of World War II that “In a global war of great complexity, personal relationships at the top were of even greater importance than usual; and, in addition, at least a few of the highest commanders had to acquire the ability to work with allies and to understand global relationships.”[2] This in turn, brings us back to Marshall’s statement of “Allied military unity of action.” As dysfunctional as the management of the war was for the Allies both on the battlefields and in the international conferences, it still managed to work in the end – because it had too – and the Allied leaders knew it.

The Sleeping Economic Giant is Awakened
America’s full-entry into the war in 1941 created a “perfect storm” for an economic boom. This enabled what Overy calls “moral energy” amongst a nation, its leaders, and its people. Propelled out of the Great Depression and into bustling wartime factories the new American labor force was able to out-produce their German and Japanese counterparts. This new moral energy was typified in the demographic shift of African Americans from the south to the new factories in the northern and western United States. For the first time in America women now had a strong presence in these same shipyards and factories. Hundreds of thousands of women entered military service for the first time in order to alleviate manpower shortages across all branches.[3] In Great Britain, nearly 23% of the 22 million member workforce in the period of 1944-45 were serving in the armed forces. Nearly one-third of the men between the ages of 14 and 64 were in uniform.[4] Across the Soviet Union this moral energy took the form of patriotism and what the Soviet citizenry now called their ‘Great Patriotic War’. Fighting for their lives, their homes, and what they thought would be a better post-war life, the Soviet citizens toiled in the factories displaced by war; turning out vast armaments and munitions which were found to be superior to their German foes.[5]

Endnotes:
1 Richard Overy, Why the Allies Won (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1995) 325.
2 Weinberg, Gerhard L., A World at Arms: A Global History of World War II, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994) 918.
3 Ibid., 496
4 Ibid., 489.
5 Ibid., 502

Bibliography:
Overy, Richard. Why the Allies Won. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1995. Page references are to the 1997 edition.
Weinberg, Gerhard L. A World at Arms: A Global History of World War II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. Page references are to the 2005 edition.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on February 5, 2012 in World War II - General

 

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: